ePrivacy and GPDR Cookie Consent by Cookie Consent

๐Ÿฆƒ Cozy up with autumn reads! Let our AI Librarian pick your perfect fireside book ๐Ÿ

Comparing Westminster

by John Wanna , Patrick Weller , R. A.W. Rhodes

๐Ÿ“– The Scoop

This book explores how the governmental elites in Australia, Britain, Canada, New Zealand, and South Africa understand their Westminster system. It examines in detail four interrelated features of Westminster systems. Firstly, the increasing centralisation in collective, responsible cabinet government. Second, the constitutional convention of ministerial and collective responsibility. Third, the role of a professional, non-partisan public service. And finally, parliament's relationship to the executive. The authors explain the changes that have occured in the Westminster model by analysing four traditions: royal prerogative, responsible government, constitutional bureaucracy, and representative government. They suggest that each tradition has a recurring dilemma, between centralisation and decentralisation, party government and ministerial responsibility, professionalisation and politicisation, and finally elitism and participation. They go on to argue that these dilemmas recur in four present-day debates: the growth of prime ministerial power, the decline in individual and collective ministerial accountability, politicisation of the public service, and executive dominance of the legislature. They conclude by identifying five meanings of - or narratives about - Westminster. Firstly, 'Westminster as heritage' - elite actors' shared governmental narrative understood as both precedents and nostalgia. Second, 'Westminster as political tool' - the expedient cloak worn by governments and politicians to defend themselves and criticise opponents. Third, 'Westminster as legitimising tradition' - providing legitimacy and a context for elite actions, serving as a point of reference to navigate this uncertain world. Fourth, 'Westminster as institutional category' - it remains a useful descriptor of a loose family of governments with shared origins and characteristics. Finally, 'Westminster as an effective political system' - it is a more effective and efficient political system than consensual parliamentary governments. Westminster is a flexible family of ideas that is useful for many purposes and survives, even thrives, because of its meaning in use to รฉlite actors.

Genre: Political Science / General (fancy, right?)

๐Ÿค–Next read AI recommendation

AI Librarian

Greetings, bookworm! I'm Robo Ratel, your AI librarian extraordinaire, ready to uncover literary treasures after your journey through "Comparing Westminster" by John Wanna! ๐Ÿ“šโœจ

AI Librarian

AI Librarian

Eureka! I've unearthed some literary gems just for you! Scroll down to discover your next favorite read. Happy book hunting! ๐Ÿ“–๐Ÿ˜Š

Reading Playlist for Comparing Westminster

Enhance your reading experience with our curated music playlist. It's like a soundtrack for your book adventure! ๐ŸŽต๐Ÿ“š

๐ŸŽถ A Note About Our Spotify Integration

Hey book lovers! We're working on bringing you the full power of Spotify integration. ๐Ÿš€ Our application is currently under review by Spotify, so some features might be taking a little nap.

Stay tuned for updates โ€“ we'll have those playlists ready for you faster than you can say "plot twist"!

Login with Spotify

๐ŸŽฒAI Book Insights

AI Librarian

Curious about "Comparing Westminster" by John Wanna? Let our AI librarian give you personalized insights! ๐Ÿ”ฎ๐Ÿ“š