ePrivacy and GPDR Cookie Consent by Cookie Consent

🦃 Cozy up with autumn reads! Let our AI Librarian pick your perfect fireside book 🍁

The Sources of Disagreement Among International Macro Models and Implications for Policy Coordination

by Jeffrey A. Frankel

📖 The Scoop

This paper makes use of the simulation results of 12 leading large international econometric models, as to the effects of commonly specified changes in monetary and fiscal policy, conducted under the Brookings exercise "Empirical Macroeconomics for Interdependent Economies." The first half of the paper examines disagreement among the models on the signs of policy multipliers, and how such disagreement compares to the ambiguities appearing in the theoretical literature. There turns out to be relatively little disagreement as to the effects on output, prices and the exchange rate. The greatest disagreement is rather over the question whether a monetary expansion worsens or improves the current account. The second half of the paper examines the implications for internationa lmacroeconomic policy coordination. The existing literature makes the unrealistic assumption that policy-makers all know the true model, from whichit follows that the Nash bargaining solution is in general superior to the Nash competitive solution. But everything changes once we recognize that policy-makers' models, as the models in the Brookings simulations, differ from each other and therefore from the "true" model. When the central bank and fiscal authorities subscribe to conflicting models, it is still true that(1) the competitive equilibrium is sub-optimal, and that (2) the two authorities will in general be able to agree on a cooperative policy package that each believes will improve the objective function; however, (3) the bargaining solution is as likely to move the target variables in the wrong direction as in the right direction, in the light of a third true model. Out of 1,210possible combinations of different models subscribed to by the two policy authorities and models representing reality, bargaining raises welfare in only 819 cases. The conclusion is that disagreement as to the true model maybe a more serious obstacle to successful policy coordination than is institutional failure to enforce Pareto-improving solutions

Genre: No Category (fancy, right?)

🤖Next read AI recommendation

AI Librarian

Greetings, bookworm! I'm Robo Ratel, your AI librarian extraordinaire, ready to uncover literary treasures after your journey through "The Sources of Disagreement Among International Macro Models and Implications for Policy Coordination" by Jeffrey A. Frankel! 📚✨

AI Librarian

AI Librarian

Eureka! I've unearthed some literary gems just for you! Scroll down to discover your next favorite read. Happy book hunting! 📖😊

Reading Playlist for The Sources of Disagreement Among International Macro Models and Implications for Policy Coordination

Enhance your reading experience with our curated music playlist. It's like a soundtrack for your book adventure! 🎵📚

🎶 A Note About Our Spotify Integration

Hey book lovers! We're working on bringing you the full power of Spotify integration. 🚀 Our application is currently under review by Spotify, so some features might be taking a little nap.

Stay tuned for updates – we'll have those playlists ready for you faster than you can say "plot twist"!

Login with Spotify

🎲AI Book Insights

AI Librarian

Curious about "The Sources of Disagreement Among International Macro Models and Implications for Policy Coordination" by Jeffrey A. Frankel? Let our AI librarian give you personalized insights! 🔮📚