๐ The Scoop
What's Good on TV? Understanding Ethics Through Television presents an introduction to the basic theories and concepts of moral philosophy using concrete examples from classic and contemporary television shows.
- Utilizes clear examples from popular contemporary and classic television shows, such as The Office, Law and Order, Star Trek and Family Guy, to illustrate complex philosophical concepts
- Designed to be used as a stand-alone or supplementary introductory ethics text
- Features case studies, study questions, and suggested readings
- Episodes mentioned are from a wide variety of television shows, and are easily accessible
- Offers a balanced treatment of a number of controversial ethical issues including environmental ethics, animal welfare, abortion, homosexuality, capital punishment, assisted suicide, censorship and the erosion of values
- Includes a companion website at http://whatsgoodontv.webs.com
Genre: Philosophy / Ethics & Moral Philosophy (fancy, right?)
๐คNext read AI recommendation
Greetings, bookworm! I'm Robo Ratel, your AI librarian extraordinaire, ready to uncover literary treasures after your journey through "What's Good on TV?" by Jamie Carlin Watson! ๐โจ
Eureka! I've unearthed some literary gems just for you! Scroll down to discover your next favorite read. Happy book hunting! ๐๐
Reading Playlist for What's Good on TV?
Enhance your reading experience with our curated music playlist. It's like a soundtrack for your book adventure! ๐ต๐
๐ถ A Note About Our Spotify Integration
Hey book lovers! We're working on bringing you the full power of Spotify integration. ๐ Our application is currently under review by Spotify, so some features might be taking a little nap.
Stay tuned for updates โ we'll have those playlists ready for you faster than you can say "plot twist"!
๐ฒAI Book Insights
Curious about "What's Good on TV?" by Jamie Carlin Watson? Let our AI librarian give you personalized insights! ๐ฎ๐
Book Match Prediction
AI-Generated Summary
Note: This summary is AI-generated and may not capture all nuances of the book.
